May be, May be not

In this section of  Republic Act No. 7610, which was passed on June 17, 1992, the absence of the word "not" changed the intent of the law:

Somebody must have spotted the problem and in order to correct it, they passed RA 9231 on December 19, 2003:

But it seemed they also renamed Section 12 to Section 2. Gets mo?

Felonious act of offended

Page 76, The Revised Penal Code, Book One, 2008 Ed., by Reyes:

From the little Spanish I learned from mi abuelo, Sr. Pedro E. Cortes, que de habla Española, sister should be asister.

Abuse of desertion

The Labor Code, With Comments and Cases by C. A. Azucena, Vol. I, 2010 Ed., page 66:

Ad coelum ad internos or Ad column ad inferos?

In discussing the restriction on surface right on a parcel of land Paras has this to say on Page 194, Vol. II, 2008 Edition, of the New Civil Code of the Philippines Annotated:

 

 

De Leon on the other hand, on page 126 of the book Comments and Cases on Property, 2006 Edition, states thus:

 



Take note that they are quoting from the same source.

Here's how the Wikipedia words it: Cuius est solum, eius est usque ad coelom et ad inferos.

It seems both are half-right. Or half-wrong?

Typewriter or Notebook?

From Paras' Civil Code of the Philippines Annotated, Vol IV, 2008 Ed., p.121:

Facts -

Held -

Could be a case of trying to transition the textbook from the typewriter era to the computer age. But not enough equivalence. Typewriter is equivalent to computer plus printer. Right?

A Rex Bookstore staff says they are coming out with a revised edition soon for all Paras textbooks.