From The 1987 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines, A Commentary, 2009 Edition by Joaquin G. Bernas, S.J.:
Page 107,
Page 208,
Page 302,
Page 311,
Saturday, August 27, 2016
Saturday, August 20, 2016
Very busy weekend.
No posting this weekend. There were some big gaps in my reading time due to filial responsibility.
Sunday, August 14, 2016
Sunday conundrum, 14 August 2016
In discussing Article 75 of the Revised Penal Code, Reyes has this to say on page 784 of his book The Revised Penal Code, Book One, 2012 Edition:
I have no problem with Par. 1 and 2. But where did he get his line of reasoning for the first clause of Par. 3?
I have no problem with Par. 1 and 2. But where did he get his line of reasoning for the first clause of Par. 3?
Saturday, August 13, 2016
Saturday typos, 13 August 2016
From the Civil Code of the Philippines, Annotated, Vol. I, 2013 Edition by Edgardo L. Paras:
Page 258,
Page 291,
Page 392,
Page 258,
Page 291,
Page 392,
Sunday, August 7, 2016
Judgment in civil action: Regalado v Pamaran
On page 368 of the Remedial Law Compendium Vol. II, 11th Edition by Florenz D. Regalado the author quotes and explains Section 5 of Rule 111 in this manner:
In effect he says here that judgment in a criminal action does not bar a civil action. I think Regalado is 180 degree off topic.
Manuel R. Pamaran hits the nail on the head on page 198 of his book Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure Annotated, 2012 Edition:
In effect he says here that judgment in a criminal action does not bar a civil action. I think Regalado is 180 degree off topic.
Manuel R. Pamaran hits the nail on the head on page 198 of his book Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure Annotated, 2012 Edition:
Saturday, August 6, 2016
Saturday typos, 6 August 2016
From The Civil Code of the Philippines, Commentaries and Jurisprudence, Vol.I by Arturo M. Tolentino:
Page 126,
Page 162,
Page 192,
Page 126,
Page 162,
Page 192,
Saturday, July 30, 2016
Saturday typos, 30 July 2016
From the Commentaries and Jurisprudence on the Civil Code of the Philippines, Vol. 1 by Arturo M. Tolentino:
Page 29,
Page 30,
Page 46,
Page 29,
Page 30,
Page 46,
Sunday, July 24, 2016
Sunday conundrum, 24 July 2016
From the Civil Code of the Philippines, Annotated, Vol. I, 2013 Edition by Edgardo L. Paras:
Are some rights public and may, therefore, be privatized? Page 195.
Who are the "deeds" that can vote? Page 270.
Now this reminds me of a favorite story of Atty. Pat Acabodillo, one of my professors in Land Titles and Deeds. Somebody went to his office to ask for a certificate of death. He happened to be the Register of Deeds of Mandaue City at the time.
Are some rights public and may, therefore, be privatized? Page 195.
Who are the "deeds" that can vote? Page 270.
Now this reminds me of a favorite story of Atty. Pat Acabodillo, one of my professors in Land Titles and Deeds. Somebody went to his office to ask for a certificate of death. He happened to be the Register of Deeds of Mandaue City at the time.
Saturday, July 23, 2016
Saturday typos, 23 July 2016
From The Labor Code, With Comments and Cases, Vol. I, 2010 Edition by C.A. Azucena Jr.:
Page 89,
Page 91,
Page 96,
Page 89,
Page 91,
Page 96,
Sunday, July 17, 2016
Sunday misnomer, 17 July 2016
From the Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure, Annotated, 2013 Edition by Manuel R. Pamaran:
What is a statue of limitation? Page 39,
The Rules of Court say that the judge must propound searching questions before issuing a search warrant. What about investigating questions? Are they for investigation warrants? Page 219,
What is a statue of limitation? Page 39,
The Rules of Court say that the judge must propound searching questions before issuing a search warrant. What about investigating questions? Are they for investigation warrants? Page 219,
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






















