Sunday, August 11, 2013

Faulty parallelism

On page 124 of Tax Principles and Remedies, 2011 Ed. by Japar B. Dimaampao:


The class of  Prof. Escobar would notice that this is an example of faulty parallelism and would have corrected it this way:
. . . must not transgress any constitutional provision nor be repugnant to . . .
And somebody would also further suggest:
. . . must neither transgress . . .  nor . . .

No comments:

Post a Comment